Sustainable Beef Systems Can Achieve Climate Neutrality

.
.
(.)

“We can demonstrate climate neutrality through mitigation of methane warming equivalent emissions, and this can be achieved more easily with a combination of emissions mitigation and land-based carbon assimilation” said Dr. Jason Sawyer, King Ranch Institute for Ranch Management adjunct professor and East Foundation Chief Science Officer. Sawyer gave his presentation titled “Toward Climate Neutral Beef: Are There Viable Paths?” during the Beef Improvement Federation (BIF) Symposium June 2 in Las Cruces, New Mexico.

Sawyer explained the current state of the beef industry with regard to climate concerns and discussed mitigation pathways the industry might take towards achieving climate neutrality.

Current state of climate concerns

Warming is the greatest expressed climate concern and is related to an increase in atmospheric greenhouse gases. Climate neutral systems have minimal effects on project global temperature change and remove as many ‘warming equivalents’ from the atmosphere as they emit. Carbon neutral systems remove as much carbon from the atmosphere as they emit and may have no effect, reduce, or reverse anthropogenic warming. Zero-emission systems have no carbon emission and are generally unrealistic.

Jason Sawyer
Dr. Jason Sawyer

“Climate neutrality implies a system with a minimal effect on projected global temperature change in a system that can remove as many equivalents as it emits and would have no measurable effect on projected warming,” Sawyer explained. “A carbon neutral system would remove as much carbon from the atmosphere as it emits, but that exchange of carbon atoms could have either increase, have effect, or reduce warming. Zero emission systems imply that no carbon emissions of any kind are generated and candidly, that’s just not a realistic biological system.”

Current limitations to achieving climate neutrality

The most prevalent limitation to the U.S. beef industry in achieving climate neutrality is the amount of available data to make accurate climate impact estimates. The GWP100 equivalence conversion does not effectively represent the temperature effects of short-lived gases like methane. Methane has an atmospheric lifetime of between eight and 12 years.

“All of the evidence currently suggests that methane’s lifetime in the atmosphere has actually decreased since pre-industrial times with a lifetime of 12 years to a current estimated lifetime of around 8.4 years,” Sawyer said. “This relatively short atmospheric life means that temperature effects depend on the time horizon evaluated. Simple conversion factors like GWP100 tend to overestimate the warming effects of methane, especially in ongoing emissions systems rather than when evaluating ‘new’ sources of emissions.”

The GWP* metric has been proposed as a means of expressing the warming equivalent impacts of methane and is based on effects of a change in the rate of methane emissions on temperature. Use of the GWP* warming equivalent gives clearer insight into the effects of mitigation strategies that move the system toward climate neutrality. Strategies like diet management and genetic selection have promise. For example, based on heritabilities and the variance in daily methane emissions it’s been estimated than a 0.4 percent reduction is achievable through genetic selection. This amount can result in a substantial reduction in the apparent warming footprint of the beef system.

Most life cycle assessments of beef production systems do not consider internal uptake of atmospheric carbon dioxide in the land base used for beef production in the US. Even at small values of uptake per acre, these ‘insets’ can be meaningful. “The real implication is that beef systems may already be climate neutral or positive. The environmentally sound component of the sustainability of beef systems has an impact on the social acceptability of beef production and how it drives demand,” Sawyer summarized.

To watch Sawyer’s full presentation, visit https://youtu.be/SFKkSYEOjc4. For more information about this year’s Symposium and the Beef Improvement Federation, including additional presentations and award winners, visit BIFSymposium.com.

 

Latest News

APHIS Now Thinks Wild Birds Are to Blame for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza's Arrival on Four U.S. Dairies
APHIS Now Thinks Wild Birds Are to Blame for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza's Arrival on Four U.S. Dairies

The livestock industry continues to grapple with the first confirmed cases of HPAI in cattle, while federal and state agencies continue to assure consumers there's no concern about the safety of the U.S. milk supply.

AABP Creates 'Using Credentialed Veterinary Technicians  in Bovine Practice' Guidelines
AABP Creates 'Using Credentialed Veterinary Technicians in Bovine Practice' Guidelines

Utilizing credentialed veterinary technicians (CVTs) in bovine practice can assist veterinarians in providing additional and efficient services to their large animal clients.

Get the Facts Straight on Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza
Get the Facts Straight on Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza

Now that the mystery illness impacting some dairy herds has been revealed as the same strain of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza that has been impacting the U.S. poultry flock, pork producers are asking questions.

New Guide Helps Producers Maximize Values of Cull Cows
New Guide Helps Producers Maximize Values of Cull Cows

A new resource developed by the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association and CattleFax helps cattle producers maximize profitability from their culling decisions.

"Boring" Technology Will Reshape Dairy Over the Next 10 Years
"Boring" Technology Will Reshape Dairy Over the Next 10 Years

Once a technology becomes a boring experience it means it has become proven, well-adopted, and easy to utilize. There are three "boring" technologies silently shaping the industry.

Meat Institute: Properly Prepared Beef is Safe to Eat; HPAI is not a Food Safety Threat
Meat Institute: Properly Prepared Beef is Safe to Eat; HPAI is not a Food Safety Threat

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and USDA food safety experts, properly prepared beef is safe to eat and is not a food safety risk to humans.