Calcium Boluses are Not Created Equal. Consider the Differences

.
.
(File Photo)

Administering calcium boluses to fresh cows has become a widely adopted practice to prevent hypocalcemia on U.S. dairy farms.

But are all calcium boluses equally effective? According to a study by a group of Canadian researchers: no.

The research team, led by Walter Verhoef with the Bureau Vétérinaire de Richmond, Richmond, Quebec, Canada, evaluated three different, commercially available calcium boluses:

    Bolus 1 – calcium chloride, no calcium carbonate
    Bolus 2 – calcium chloride, moderate calcium carbonate
    Bolus 3 – calcium chloride, high calcium carbonate

Using fistulated animals, they placed boluses in a pre-weighed coarse mesh net for 30, 60, 90, 120, 180 and 240 minutes to measure dissolution rates. They found Bolus 1 dissolved the fastest at less than 90 minutes. Bolus 2 dissolved in less than 240 minutes. After 240 minutes, most of Bolus 3 had not yet dissolved, with 75% of it remaining intact.

Next, the team evaluated the calcium uptake of second- and third-lactation postpartum cows on different calcium treatment regimens:

    Treatment 1 – 2 calcium chloride boluses at less than 12 hours postpartum.
    Treatment 2 – 1 calcium chloride bolus at less than 12 hours postpartum, and 1 at 12 hours later.
    Treatment 3 – 2 high calcium carbonate boluses at less than 12 hours postpartum

The animals receiving Treatment 1 had a greater and more persistent serum calcium response than those receiving Treatment 2. Serum calcium response was lowest for Treatment 3, consistent with the comparably low dissolution rate for calcium carbonate boluses.

Verhoef and his team concluded that calcium chloride/calcium sulfate boluses were more effective at generating serum calcium response than boluses containing high amounts of calcium carbonate. They also suggested that administering two boluses together within 12 hours of calving may be more effective than the traditional treatment of giving two boluses 12 hours apart.

 

Latest News

APHIS Now Thinks Wild Birds Are to Blame for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza's Arrival on Four U.S. Dairies
APHIS Now Thinks Wild Birds Are to Blame for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza's Arrival on Four U.S. Dairies

The livestock industry continues to grapple with the first confirmed cases of HPAI in cattle, while federal and state agencies continue to assure consumers there's no concern about the safety of the U.S. milk supply.

AABP Creates 'Using Credentialed Veterinary Technicians  in Bovine Practice' Guidelines
AABP Creates 'Using Credentialed Veterinary Technicians in Bovine Practice' Guidelines

Utilizing credentialed veterinary technicians (CVTs) in bovine practice can assist veterinarians in providing additional and efficient services to their large animal clients.

Get the Facts Straight on Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza
Get the Facts Straight on Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza

Now that the mystery illness impacting some dairy herds has been revealed as the same strain of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza that has been impacting the U.S. poultry flock, pork producers are asking questions.

New Guide Helps Producers Maximize Values of Cull Cows
New Guide Helps Producers Maximize Values of Cull Cows

A new resource developed by the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association and CattleFax helps cattle producers maximize profitability from their culling decisions.

"Boring" Technology Will Reshape Dairy Over the Next 10 Years
"Boring" Technology Will Reshape Dairy Over the Next 10 Years

Once a technology becomes a boring experience it means it has become proven, well-adopted, and easy to utilize. There are three "boring" technologies silently shaping the industry.

Meat Institute: Properly Prepared Beef is Safe to Eat; HPAI is not a Food Safety Threat
Meat Institute: Properly Prepared Beef is Safe to Eat; HPAI is not a Food Safety Threat

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and USDA food safety experts, properly prepared beef is safe to eat and is not a food safety risk to humans.