|
Bovine Veterinarian MagazineBovine Veterinarian is the only business publication specifically targeted to veterinarians and nutritionists who devote a significant amount of their time to bovine practice. It focuses on providing leading-edge information to help them improve the marketing of their skills to beef and dairy producer clients. |
Bovine Veterinarian MagazineBovine Veterinarian is the only business publication specifically targeted to veterinarians and nutritionists who devote a significant amount of their time to bovine practice. It focuses on providing leading-edge information to help them improve the marketing of their skills to beef and dairy producer clients.
|
E. coli and WDGS in feedlot diets
Geni Wren, Bovine Veterinarian Magazine | February 01, 2012
- Clinical mastitis video available
- HSUS ads deceive 90% of donors
- NCBA supports USDA proposed comprehensive BSE rule
- Real-world research

- Calif. TV station investigates 'what’s in your milk'
- Handle arrival cattle with care

- Thank Domino’s; order a pizza
- Managing young bulls
- Take her higher
- Examining cattle at a distance
- Innate immunity in the bovine
- Examining cattle at a distance
- AVC takes on Washington
- Managing young bulls
- Managing calf surges
- Simmons named NCBA’s chief veterinarian
- Salmonella in beef cattle
- BVDV survival on fomites
- DAMN-IT -- why did that cow die?
- Semen quality: A picture is worth a thousand words
NASHVILLE, Tenn. -- In the beef safety section of Cattlemen’s College at the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association annual convention Feb. 1, the link between Escherichia coli O157:H7 and the feeding of wet distiller’s grains (WDGS) was discussed.
Meat Animal Research Center researcher Elaine Berry, PhD, outlined studies looking at different levels of WDGS in growing and finishing diets and the effect on E. coli prevalence in hides and fecal matter.
Berry said in one study where controls were fed no WDGS in the ration and others were fed 40% WDGS, fecal samples during finishing in the controls was 1.5% versus 15% positive samples in the 40% WDGS group.
Hide samples were similar in that 33% of the cattle fed 40% WDGS were positive for E. coli on the hide, versus 9% in the controls.
“High WDGS levels in the finishing diets did increase E. coli O157:H7,” Berry said. “This indicates mechanisms by which E. coli increases, and may point to potential control points.”
She said, however, that eliminating WDGS is not the goal, but rather “can we reduce E. coli when feeding? Can we feed WDGS initially and then remove it from the diet before finishing?”
Another study was done to determine just that.
Cattle were fed a silage-based growing diets with WDGS included at none, 40% and 70%. After the growing phase of 56 days the percentage of WDGS in the diet was reduced to none, 15% or 40%, and the cattle were fed another 56 days.
At finishing, fecal samples showed that the WDGS-free controls were 2% positive; the 40% group was 35% positive; and the original 70% group was 38% positive.
“The treatment group maintained on the 40% WDGS had higher levels than animals fed no WDGS, and when shifted from the higher diet to the lower diet, that group shifted significantly lower. Hide contamination was significantly higher in the 40% WDGS group than the controls, Berry said.
“Feeding high levels of 40% and 70% WDGS can increase E. coli prevalence in feces and hides,” she said. “But reducing the amount fed as well as the timeframe may reduce E. coli."
|
© Copyright 2012
Vance Publishing Corporation All rights reserved.
|
BOVINE VETERINARIAN
Current Issue About Us Contact Us Advertise |
OUR COMMUNITIES
Drovers CattleNetwork Dairy Herd Network Pork Network Ag Professional Vance Publishing |
VANCE PUBLISHING
List Rentals Terms of Use Privacy Policy Site map
|



Comments (0)
Leave a comment