NCBA: HSUS, OCM form alliance to destroy Beef Checkoff

 Resize text        

National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) President J.D. Alexander expressed disgust following an announcement that the Organization for Competitive Markets (OCM) has formed a partnership with the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) to destroy more than 25 years of market development and consumer demand building by the Beef Checkoff Program.

Specifically, on Aug. 9, OCM announced it will file a lawsuit seeking an injunction against the USDA's Agricultural Marketing Service, Cattlemen’s Beef Board and the Beef Promotion Operating Committee. OCM President and Director Fred Stokes stated during the press briefing that HSUS is helping fund its efforts to file the lawsuit. OCM claims to advocate for a fair, competitive agricultural marketplace; however, in doing so it partnered with an organization known for its anti-agriculture agenda. According to Alexander, independent research shows the beef checkoff is supported by nearly 75 percent of cattlemen and women.

“HSUS is an organization going state by state vowing to end production agriculture by outlawing scientifically validated production practices in animal agriculture. Their efforts put people out of business and often jeopardize the well-being of livestock,” said Alexander.

OCM made no secrets about its connection to HSUS during the press conference.

Stokes said, “OCM and every cowboy out there owes a deep gratitude to the Humane Society of the United States.”

Alexander, who is also an independent cattle feeder from Pilger, Neb., said it is paramount for cattlemen and cattlewomen to know that OCM is working with an extremist animal rights group to disable a program dedicated to building demand for beef.

“Their actions will impact consumers by increasing protein costs at the grocery store. They are no friend to family farmers and ranchers or consumers and will be challenged at every corner by NCBA,” said Alexander. “Animal agriculture is vital to sustaining food production and we will not sit by and allow these organizations to stifle our ability to mitigate hunger and feed people here and abroad.”


Sponsored Links


Comments (3) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Leanne    
Florida  |  August, 13, 2012 at 04:25 PM

A few years ago, I would have assumed your "beef" with the HSUS was all about profit on your end, that you were objecting to cleanliness inspections and source disclosures. I personally prefer meat and eggs which are "free-range". That being said, I recently had friends who told me it is no longer legal here to raise one's own livestock within city limits, not even chickens! Suddenly, HSUS was on my radar, as these same friends passed on that HSUS are not affiliated with any LOCAL HS, nor contribute to shelters or rescue operations. I confirmed this locally. All they do is try to shut down large commercial operations, they don't even encourage small "organic" farms or homesteaders. "Free-range" is my choice, and I pay more for it. You growers should have the option to decide which market you cater to. It should NOT be legislated; government is for guaranteeing our safety, not dictating our lifestyles! And I realllly hate sneakiness, which seems to define HSUS.

Shelia    
Missouri  |  August, 13, 2012 at 06:11 PM

"The head of the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS)—Wayne Pacelle—says the reason his group is supporting a lawsuit against the beef checkoff is because of the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association’s (NCBA) opposition to the so-called “egg bill” in Congress."

Divide & conquer.

http://brownfieldagnews.com/2012/08/13/pacelle-ncba-should-stay-in-its-lane/

Kelsie    
Kansas City  |  August, 14, 2012 at 05:52 PM

I work at a local animal shelter and can tell you that dollar for dollar your money is best spent to save animals by
donating to The Humane Society of the US. I am profoundly grateful for the hard work that HSUS does not prevent
the pet overpopluation crisis as well as the work they do to ensure safety and humane treatment for farmed
animals. HSUS did work with a large number of small farmers and small farmers unions on the Egg Bill which
originated as a ballot initiative in Washington State. It was the United Egg Producers that came to the table with an
agreement to make the initiative a federal bill because they saw that the baron battery cage is quickly becoming
seen as an outdated, inhumane and unsafe practice by consumers.