|
Bovine Veterinarian MagazineBovine Veterinarian is the only business publication specifically targeted to veterinarians and nutritionists who devote a significant amount of their time to bovine practice. It focuses on providing leading-edge information to help them improve the marketing of their skills to beef and dairy producer clients. |
Bovine Veterinarian MagazineBovine Veterinarian is the only business publication specifically targeted to veterinarians and nutritionists who devote a significant amount of their time to bovine practice. It focuses on providing leading-edge information to help them improve the marketing of their skills to beef and dairy producer clients.
|
Be a 'green' veterinarian by improving efficiency
Tom Quaife, Dairy Herd Management | November 15, 2011
- Clinical mastitis video available
- HSUS ads deceive 90% of donors
- NCBA supports USDA proposed comprehensive BSE rule
- Real-world research

- Calif. TV station investigates 'what’s in your milk'
- Handle arrival cattle with care

- Thank Domino’s; order a pizza
- Managing young bulls
- Take her higher
- Examining cattle at a distance
- Innate immunity in the bovine
- Examining cattle at a distance
- AVC takes on Washington
- Managing young bulls
- Managing calf surges
- Simmons named NCBA’s chief veterinarian
- Salmonella in beef cattle
- BVDV survival on fomites
- DAMN-IT -- why did that cow die?
- Semen quality: A picture is worth a thousand words
Consider all of the steps in getting milk to the consumer: crop production, milk production, processing, transportation, retail, consumption and disposal. So, it may come as a surprise to learn that a majority of milk’s “carbon footprint” occurs in one particular area — the milk-production stage.
“The farm print is significantly higher than other sources,” Marty Matlock, director of the Center for Agricultural and Rural Sustainability at the University of Arkansas, told those attending the 2011 American Association of Bovine Practitioners annual meeting in St. Louis. “Farm-gate is where the action is” as far as reducing greenhouse-gas emissions, he said.
Based on a survey of more than 500 farms, and their own scientific calculations, Center for Agricultural and Rural Sustainability researchers determined that the carbon footprint for milk is: 17.6 lbs of carbon dioxide equivalent per gallon of milk consumed. And, approximately 52% of that comes from milk production, according to their calculations. There are many things that farm managers, nutritionists and veterinarians can do at the farm level to reduce the impact of greenhouse-gas emissions. For instance, the quality of feed makes a difference.
“High forage quality reduces methane production compared to low-quality forage,” Mike Hutjens, extension dairy specialist at the University of Illinois pointed out. Quality in this case is correlated with dry matter digestibility which, in turn, is correlated with feed efficiency.
Anything that gets more milk out of cows will help improve efficiency and reduce greenhouse gases, Hutjens said.
Here are some Hutjens’ other suggestions for improving dairy’s carbon footprint:
- Only high-producing cows allowed.
- Milk all cows three times a day (since that will produce more milk than 2X).
- All cows injected with bovine somatotropin or rbST.
- All dairy animals fed an ionophore.
- Heifers calve at 22 months of age.
- Only milk lower than 400,000 somatic cell count marketed (because low-SCC cows are more efficient).
- All cows bred artificially to superior bulls.
- All cows enrolled in a milk records program.
For more information on the AABP conference, visit the Bovine Veterinarian AABP page. For more information about AABP, click here.
|
© Copyright 2012
Vance Publishing Corporation All rights reserved.
|
BOVINE VETERINARIAN
Current Issue About Us Contact Us Advertise |
OUR COMMUNITIES
Drovers CattleNetwork Dairy Herd Network Pork Network Ag Professional Vance Publishing |
VANCE PUBLISHING
List Rentals Terms of Use Privacy Policy Site map
|



Comments (0)
Leave a comment